Clash on Campus: Over 50 Pro-Palestinian Protesters Arrested at Columbia University in Escalating Tensions
On a high-wire Wednesday afternoon, Columbia University was the newest hotbed of free speech, student activism, and Israeli Palestinian conflict debate. More than 50 pro-Palestinian demonstrators were arrested by New York Police Department (NYPD) officers after they took over part of the university’s legendary Butler Library, organizing one of the biggest campus demonstrations since the wave of activism ignited by Israel’s 2023 Gaza war. The theatrical moment of students being dragged off in zip-ties, packed into cop cars, and arrested on charges of trespass has renewed public discussion around protest boundaries, accountability in institutions, and the purpose of universities during geopolitics.
This post breaks down what happened at the protest, what came out in the university’s and activists’ reactions, and the wider effects for campus movements during an intensified age of politics.
A Legacy of Protest at Columbia
Columbia University, an old epicenter of campus activism, has been a social justice battleground for decades. The campus of Columbia University’s Morningside Heights has reflected worldwide tensions time and again, ranging from anti-war protests against the Vietnam War during the 1960s to the 2023 “Gaza Solidarity Encampment.”. During last year, student organizations such as Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) held rallies, teach-ins, and building occupations calling on the university to divest from corporations that have connections with Israel’s military involvement in Gaza. Although some protests resulted in negotiations, others involved confrontations with administration and arrests.
The most recent demonstration, however, represents a dramatic turn. By occupying the Butler Library—a core academic building—protesters sought to get their point across, invoking comparisons with past acts of civil disobedience while gauging the administration’s limits of tolerance for disturbing activism.
The Protest: Occupation, Demands, and Police Response
The Occupation
On Wednesday morning, dozens of students entered Butler Library, unfurling banners reading “Columbia Divests From Genocide” and “Free Palestine.” The group, a coalition of SJP, JVP, and allied organizations, declared the space a “Liberated Zone” and vowed to remain until the university met their demands:
- Full disclosure of Columbia’s financial ties to Israel.
- Divestment from companies supplying weapons to the Israeli military.
- Amnesty for students disciplined in prior protests.
Protesters distributed pamphlets linking Columbia’s investments to civilian casualties in Gaza, where over 36,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023, according to local health authorities.
The Crackdown
By noon, university officials delivered an ultimatum: leave the library or get arrested. When demonstrators stood firm, Columbia President Minouche Shafik sanctioned NYPD intervention—a move that precipitated widespread condemnation. More than 100 officers in riot gear poured into the library, taking students away systematically. Videos shared on social media revealed police pinning protesters using plastic zip-ties, while some joined arms and recited, “Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest!”
NYPD confirmed at least 50 students were arrested for criminal trespass and disorderly conduct. NYPD affirmed further arrests while officers evacuated the upper floors of the six-story building.
Reactions: Outrage, Solidarity, and Institutional Defense
Student and Faculty Backlash
Numerous students decried the police response as disproportionate. “This is a space that is meant for learning and for dialogue, not for militarized repression,” declared SJP organizer Leila Hassan, a senior. Faculty members, including tenured faculty, joined demonstrations outside the library, charging that the administration was suppressing dissent.
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Columbia Chapter made a statement: “The application of police violence against peaceful demonstrators erodes academic freedom and the mission of the university.”
Administration’s Stance
President Shafik justified the move, citing security reasons and the library as “a non-political academic space.” In an email to students, she stated, “While we respect the right to protest, occupations that disrupt university operations cannot be tolerated.”
The university also pointed to previous attempts to negotiate with protesters, such as establishing a task force to consider divestment proposals—a step activists labeled as a “delay tactic.”
External Responses
The arrests made national headlines. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) denounced the “criminalization of pro-Palestine speech,” while pro-Israel organizations such as StandWithUs commended Columbia for “maintaining order.” Politicians reacted along party lines: Progressive Democrats such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denounced the arrests as “an overreach,” while GOP legislators accused protesters of “antisemitic intimidation.”
Broader Implications: Free Speech vs. Institutional Control
The clash at Columbia reflects wider tensions gripping U.S. campuses:
- The Israeli Palestinian Debate on Campus
Universities have struggled to balance free speech with accusations of antisemitism and Islamophobia. While Columbia’s Hamas-Israel FAQ page condemns antisemitism, critics argue that pro-Palestine activism is disproportionately policed. - The Militarization of Campus Security
The NYPD’s involvement echoes similar crackdowns at UC Berkeley and UCLA, raising questions about when (or if) police should intervene in student protests. - Divestment as a Protest Tool
Student demands for ethical divestment—from apartheid South Africa to fossil fuels—have a long history. Yet, the complexity of tracing university investments in global conflicts complicates these efforts.
Historical Echoes: From 1968 to 2024
The Butler Library sit-in draws historical parallel to Columbia’s 1968 protests, where students shut down five buildings protesting the university’s involvement with the Vietnam War and calling for a Black studies department. There too, as at Butler this morning, police arrived to forcibly clear protesters, in that instance for 700 arrests and closing of the campus.
Where causes are distinct, the comparison is striking: another generation of students employing civil disobedience against institutional involvement in a global catastrophe.
A Microcosm of Global Struggles
Columbia’s current crisis is not merely a campus conflict—it’s a miniature of the international debate about justice, power, and the role of institutions in sustaining violence. As universities walk the tightrope of their dual status as citadels of free discourse and economic agents immersed in geopolitics, the distinction between protest and disruption blurs further.
For the arrested students, the battle now moves to courtrooms and disciplinary hearings. For Columbia, the challenge is to balance its history of activism with its contemporary responsibilities. And for observers everywhere, the message is clear: The struggle for Palestine—and the heart of the university—is far from over.
In an era when campuses are laboratories of democracy and battlegrounds of contention, the Columbia events remind us that the quest for justice is seldom silent, seldom peaceful, and never without sacrifice. As one arrested student yelled as he was led to a police wagon: “You can arrest us, but you can’t arrest the movement.”
Click here to subscribe to our newsletters and get the latest updates directly to your inbox.