AMD CEO Lisa Su Sees Opportunity in China, Urges Balance in U.S. Chip Export Controls
This week, AMD CEO Lisa Su made headlines by stating that China remains a “large opportunity” for the semiconductor industry, even as escalating U.S. export controls threaten to limit trade. In a candid conversation on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street, Su emphasized the need for a balanced approach that protects national security without undermining the broader potential of American chip innovation.
🇨🇳 China: A Crucial Market for AMD and the AI Boom
Lisa Su’s remarks come at a critical juncture. As the world’s second-largest economy, China represents a massive market for semiconductors, especially those used in high-performance computing and artificial intelligence.
“There should be a balance between export controls for national security as well as ensuring that we get the widest possible adoption of our technology,” Su said.
While the U.S. government has placed increasing restrictions on chip exports to China—particularly AI and advanced computing components—AMD and other chipmakers continue to rely on Chinese demand for a significant share of revenue.
In AMD’s case, China contributes billions of dollars in annual sales. Despite export restrictions, the market remains deeply embedded in AMD’s strategy, especially as the company pushes its cutting-edge MI300 series of AI chips to compete with rivals like NVIDIA.
💰 Financial Impact: A $1.5 Billion Hit from Export Controls
Su’s comments followed the release of AMD’s fiscal first-quarter earnings report, which beat expectations and reflected strong guidance for the rest of the year. However, AMD also issued a stark warning: it expects a $1.5 billion revenue impact from ongoing restrictions on exports to China.
Specifically, the company revealed it could lose up to $800 million from reduced shipments of its MI308 chips, designed for AI data centers and high-performance computing, to China and other affected countries.
This isn’t just a financial story—it’s a strategic challenge. AMD is walking a fine line between staying compliant with U.S. regulations and meeting the demands of a tech-hungry global market. As Lisa Su noted, “There’s a balance to be played between restricting and providing access to chips.”
🧠 U.S. AI Leadership: What’s at Stake?
At the heart of Su’s comments lies a broader concern: the global AI race. The United States currently leads the world in AI chip design and innovation, with AMD, NVIDIA, and Intel at the forefront. But overly restrictive policies could backfire.
Su emphasized that widespread adoption of AI technology should be the primary objective, not just from a business standpoint but from a geopolitical one.
“U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence and widespread adoption is the primary objective and a really great position for us to be in,” she said.
If American firms are unable to sell to a key market like China, it could slow global AI adoption, hinder revenue growth, and give competitors in other countries a chance to catch up. China, for example, is aggressively investing in its domestic chip-making capabilities and may double down on self-sufficiency if foreign access becomes too restricted.
🔄 The Policy Dilemma: National Security vs Innovation
The U.S. government’s rationale for export controls is clear: prevent the misuse of advanced American technologies in military or surveillance programs that could threaten U.S. national interests. But this security-first approach risks creating unintended economic consequences.
Here’s the core policy dilemma:
| Goal | Risk |
|---|---|
| Protect U.S. national security | Alienate a major tech market like China |
| Encourage AI leadership | Limit access to global customers |
| Foster innovation | Undermine revenue streams that fuel R&D |
Lisa Su is essentially calling for smart, nuanced policies that weigh these competing interests. Overly broad restrictions may do more harm than good—not just for AMD, but for the entire U.S. tech sector.
💼 Business Strategy: AMD Navigates a Shifting Landscape
To adapt, AMD is rethinking how it develops and distributes its products. This could include:
- Creating export-compliant chip variants for specific regions
- Investing more in non-Chinese markets like India, Southeast Asia, and the EU
- Collaborating with U.S. regulators to ensure compliance while minimizing disruption
- Doubling down on R&D to stay ahead of the global competition
In fact, AMD’s focus on AI chips reflects its ambition to diversify beyond traditional CPUs and GPUs, tapping into a sector that’s projected to reach $400 billion by 2030. But it needs access to as many customers as possible to fund that future.
🧭 What’s Next for AMD and the Chip Industry?
The next few quarters will be pivotal. AMD’s performance in 2024 and 2025 will likely hinge on:
- How tightly the U.S. enforces chip export controls
- Whether China retaliates or seeks alternative chip sources
- How global demand for AI chips evolves amid regulatory tension
- Whether policymakers strike the balance Lisa Su is advocating for
Other tech giants, including NVIDIA and Intel, are watching closely. This is not just AMD’s problem—it’s an industry-wide challenge. The outcome will shape how innovation flows across borders in an increasingly divided world.
The Need for Pragmatism in a Politicized Market
Lisa Su’s message is both timely and critical. Yes, national security matters. But so does innovation, economic growth, and global competitiveness. By calling for balance, she’s reminding both governments and industry leaders that progress doesn’t thrive in isolation.
China remains a critical market—both as a customer and a competitor. Ignoring that reality risks slowing the momentum of technologies like artificial intelligence that will define the future.
As geopolitical tensions grow, AMD’s strategy offers a model: play by the rules, advocate for pragmatism, and invest in innovation. It’s a high-stakes balancing act—and one that the entire tech world is watching.
Click here to subscribe to our newsletters and get the latest updates directly to your inbox.