Global NewsHeadlines

EU–US Trade Deal in Limbo After Trump Slaps 10% Tariffs Over Greenland Claims

The long-negotiated trade agreement between the European Union and the United States has been thrown into uncertainty after Donald Trump threatened and imposed fresh tariffs on European countries, linking trade penalties to his controversial claims over Greenland. The move has added a sharp geopolitical edge to what was already a delicate economic relationship between two of the world’s largest trading blocs.

The EU–US trade deal, announced in July 2025 after months of negotiations, was meant to stabilise transatlantic trade ties following years of tariff disputes. Instead, it now risks stalling completely, as senior European lawmakers signal they are unwilling to ratify the agreement under political pressure.


Why Greenland Has Become a Trade Flashpoint

The latest tensions stem from Trump’s renewed push to “purchase” Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark and a strategic Arctic region. While the idea was widely dismissed in Europe, it has taken on new significance as geopolitical competition in the Arctic intensifies.

The situation escalated after several European nations, already facing US tariffs of 10–15 per cent on selected goods, sent a small contingent of military personnel to Greenland. The move was framed by European governments as routine cooperation and security support, but Trump interpreted it as opposition to US interests.

Trade

In response, the US administration announced an additional 10 per cent tariff on European imports, explicitly tying the measure to what Trump described as Europe’s “lack of cooperation” on Greenland.


EU Parliament Pushes Back

The tariff announcement triggered immediate political backlash in Brussels. Siegfried Muresan stated that the European Parliament’s three largest pro-European groups—the EPP Group, The Progressives, and Renew Europe—would not support ratification of the trade deal in its current form.

Their argument is straightforward: approving a trade agreement under threat of tariffs would set a dangerous precedent, allowing economic coercion to override democratic and sovereign decision-making within the EU.

Without support from these groups, the agreement has little chance of clearing the European Parliament.


Emergency Diplomacy in Brussels

As tensions mounted, Cyprus, which currently holds the rotating six-month presidency of the EU Council, convened an emergency meeting in Brussels. Ambassadors from EU member states were summoned to discuss a coordinated response to Washington’s move.

The urgency reflects growing concern that the dispute could spiral into a broader trade confrontation, undermining not just the new deal but existing trade frameworks as well.

European officials are reportedly weighing a mix of diplomatic engagement and retaliatory measures, depending on how the US responds in the coming days.


The Anti-Coercion Instrument Comes Into Focus

One of the strongest tools now being discussed is the EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument. This mechanism was designed specifically to counter economic pressure from third countries attempting to influence EU policy decisions.

If activated, the instrument could allow the EU to:

  • Limit US access to public procurement contracts
  • Restrict trade in services where the US runs a surplus with Europe
  • Impose targeted countermeasures without triggering a full-scale trade war

The fact that EU leaders are openly discussing this option highlights how seriously the bloc views the current standoff.


What Was at Stake in the EU–US Trade Deal

The trade agreement announced in July 2025 was intended to ease tensions that had built up over steel, aluminium, digital services taxes, and agricultural access. It promised reduced tariffs on key industrial goods, improved market access for services, and stronger cooperation on supply chains and green technology.

For businesses on both sides of the Atlantic, the deal offered predictability. For policymakers, it was meant to signal unity between democratic allies in an increasingly fragmented global trade environment.

Now, that progress appears fragile.


Economic Impact Beyond Politics

If the deal collapses, the economic fallout could extend beyond symbolic politics. Higher tariffs would raise costs for manufacturers, exporters, and consumers. European industries such as automobiles, machinery, and luxury goods are particularly exposed to US tariffs, while American companies benefit from strong access to European services markets.

Uncertainty alone can delay investment decisions, disrupt supply chains, and weigh on growth at a time when both economies are already navigating slower global demand.


A Broader Shift in Transatlantic Relations

The Greenland-linked tariffs reflect a broader shift in how trade and geopolitics intersect under Trump’s approach. Economic tools are increasingly being used to pursue strategic and political objectives, blurring the line between trade negotiations and security disputes.

For Europe, this raises uncomfortable questions about reliability and trust in transatlantic agreements. For the US, it risks alienating key allies at a time when global cooperation is already under strain.


How Europe Is Likely to Respond

European leaders are expected to pursue a dual strategy. Publicly, they will defend sovereignty over Greenland and reject the idea that trade concessions can be extracted through pressure. Privately, diplomatic channels may remain open in an effort to prevent a full breakdown in relations.

Whether this results in compromise or confrontation will depend largely on Washington’s next move.


What Comes Next

In the near term, markets and businesses will watch for signals from both sides. Will the US soften its stance, or will Europe move ahead with countermeasures? Will the trade deal be renegotiated, delayed, or abandoned altogether?

What is clear is that the EU–US trade deal, once seen as a stabilising force, has become entangled in a much larger geopolitical dispute—one that extends far beyond tariffs and into questions of sovereignty, security, and global power dynamics.

Click Here to subscribe to our newsletters and get the latest updates directly to your inbox


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *