Global NewsHeadlines

Pakistan, Afghanistan Extend Ceasefire After Turkey Talks

In a significant diplomatic breakthrough, Pakistan and Afghanistan have agreed to extend their fragile ceasefire for at least another week following intensive negotiations in Istanbul, according to a joint statement released by Turkey and Qatar on Thursday, October 30, 2025. The extension represents renewed commitment to peace after the two nations came close to the brink of full-scale military conflict earlier this month.

One Week Extension and Beyond

The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that both countries have agreed to maintain the ceasefire that was originally established on October 19, 2025, through bilateral negotiations in Doha mediated by Turkey and Qatar. This ceasefire, which took effect at that time, now extends for at least another week while both nations prepare for crucial high-level meetings scheduled for November 6 in Istanbul.

“All parties have agreed on the continuation of the ceasefire,” stated Turkey’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the joint statement issued on behalf of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkey, and Qatar. The announcement came after a five-day round of intensive diplomatic talks held in Istanbul from October 25-30, 2025.

A Week of Deadly Clashes

To understand the significance of this ceasefire extension, one must grasp the severity of the conflict it halted. The violence erupted following explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, which the Taliban government blamed on Pakistan. Pakistan had not officially acknowledged responsibility, but Afghan officials attributed the blasts to Pakistani military or intelligence operations.

In retaliation for these explosions, the Taliban launched cross-border military attacks into Pakistani territory. Pakistan responded with what it termed “precision strikes” targeting what it claimed were positions of Pakistani Taliban militants—the TTP (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan)—allegedly based in Afghanistan.

The resulting clashes marked the most serious military confrontations between the two nations since the Taliban’s takeover of Kabul in August 2021. According to Pakistani military statements, over 200 Afghan fighters were killed in the strikes, while Afghan officials claimed that 58 Pakistani soldiers were killed. Civilians and militants on both sides also suffered casualties.

Pakistan

The violence triggered the closure of key border crossings used for trade and transit, leaving hundreds of refugees stranded on either side of the 2,600-kilometer border and disrupting trade valued at millions of dollars.

Initial Ceasefire Breakdown

The path to the current agreement was not smooth. After an initial 48-hour ceasefire was announced on October 15, it quickly collapsed when talks broke down on October 16. Kabul blamed Pakistan for the failure, accusing Islamabad of not honoring the agreement.

A second ceasefire was negotiated in Doha on October 18-19, 2025, mediated by Qatar and Turkey, with the defense ministers of both nations signing the agreement. While this ceasefire largely held, tensions remained high as the second round of negotiations in Istanbul from October 25-30 initially faltered.

According to reports, the Istanbul talks broke down on Wednesday (October 29) after Pakistan demanded stronger assurances from Afghanistan to take action against the Pakistani Taliban (TTP), which Islamabad claims operates from Afghan territory. However, by Thursday, October 30, both sides had agreed to continue the ceasefire despite these disagreements.

The Monitoring and Verification Mechanism

A crucial element of the extended ceasefire is the establishment of a formal monitoring and verification mechanism agreed to by both nations with the support of Turkey and Qatar. This mechanism is designed to ensure compliance with the ceasefire terms and will impose penalties on whichever side is found to be violating the agreement.

“All parties have agreed to put in place a monitoring and verification mechanism that will ensure maintenance of peace and imposing penalty on the violating party,” the joint statement said. This represents the first time such a formal accountability structure has been established between the two countries, adding a crucial layer of oversight to prevent renewed violence.

The mechanism will be detailed and operationalized during the next round of talks scheduled for November 6 in Istanbul. This upcoming meeting is expected to involve higher-level officials, potentially including the defense ministers themselves, to finalize implementation details.

TTP and Terrorism

Despite the ceasefire agreement, fundamental disagreements remain between Pakistan and Afghanistan regarding terrorism and militant sanctuaries. Pakistan has consistently accused Afghanistan of harboring the TTP—a militant organization responsible for numerous attacks on Pakistani military personnel and civilians.

The Pakistani Foreign Ministry emphasized “the threat of terrorism originating from Afghan territory toward Pakistan” as a core concern in its approach to the negotiations. Pakistan argues that Afghan territory is being used as a base for launching terror attacks against Pakistani forces.

Afghanistan and the Taliban government, however, reject these allegations. Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid stated that Afghanistan seeks good relations with Pakistan “based on mutual respect and non-interference,” emphasizing that the Taliban strives to ensure that neither side poses threats to the other.

This fundamental disagreement about militant sanctuaries suggests that while the ceasefire may hold in the short term, resolving the deeper security issues will require sustained diplomatic efforts.

Diplomatic Intermediaries

Turkey and Qatar have emerged as the key mediators in this peace process, a role that reflects the growing importance of both nations in regional geopolitics. Turkey, in particular, has increased its diplomatic involvement in South Asian affairs over recent years.

According to the joint statement, both Turkey and Qatar have expressed their “appreciation for the constructive contributions” made by Pakistan and Afghanistan throughout the negotiation process, and have “reaffirmed their readiness to continue cooperation with both sides for lasting peace and stability”.

Turkey and Qatar’s commitment to hosting ongoing negotiations in Istanbul and facilitating dialogue demonstrates their investment in regional stability. The choice of Istanbul as the venue for high-level talks suggests a deliberate strategy to keep discussions in a neutral, internationally respected location.

Border Remains Closed; Trade Stalled

Despite the ceasefire extension, both nations have kept major border crossings closed, leaving trade effectively frozen. Hundreds of trucks carrying goods remain stranded on either side of the border, and refugees attempting to cross face continued restrictions.

This continued closure of borders, despite the ceasefire, reflects the level of mistrust that persists between the two sides. The reopening of trade routes will likely be a key agenda item in the November 6 talks, as both economies suffer from the disruption.

International Support for Peace Process

The conflict received attention from major regional and international powers. China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar all made calls for de-escalation during the height of the violence. Even former US President Donald Trump offered to mediate peace efforts between the two countries.

This international focus underscores the significance of the Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict not just for the two countries involved, but for regional stability in South Asia and beyond.

November 6 Talks and Beyond

The extended ceasefire provides a crucial window for both nations to move from temporary truces toward a more durable peace framework. The November 6 meeting in Istanbul is expected to be decisive in determining whether this ceasefire can evolve into a long-term agreement.

Key issues expected to be discussed include the operationalization of the monitoring and verification mechanism, the reopening of border crossings, measures to prevent militant activities, and confidence-building measures between the two militaries.

The Taliban’s emphasis on “mutual respect and non-interference” suggests Afghanistan may resist Pakistani pressure on the TTP issue, while Pakistan is unlikely to back down from its demand for action against the militant group. Finding a middle ground on this fundamental disagreement will be critical to the success of any long-term peace accord.

A Fragile Peace Holding

The extension of the ceasefire by one week represents a critical moment in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. After nearly two decades of strategic partnership—particularly during Pakistan’s support for the Taliban during their insurgency against the previous Afghan government—the two nations find themselves in open military conflict.

The ceasefire extension and the agreement to establish monitoring mechanisms suggest that both sides recognize the cost of continued warfare and are committed to exploring diplomatic solutions. However, the underlying tensions regarding militant sanctuaries and terrorism remain unresolved.

For the citizens of both countries—including the hundreds of refugees stranded at closed border crossings—the fragile ceasefire represents hope that peace may be possible. However, the road to durable peace remains long and uncertain.

Click Here to subscribe to our newsletters and get the latest updates directly to your inbox

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *