Trade Tensions Ignite: Ontario’s Electricity Tariff Provokes Trump’s Retaliatory Measures
Canada-US trade tensions this week boiled over after Ontario, Canada’s economic hub, stated a contentious 25% premium on electricity sold to the US. In under four hours, ex-President Donald Trump responded by promising to have matching tariffs against Canadian electricity, devastate Canada’s car industry, and double tariffs on aluminum and steel. The quick back-and-forth of threats again fueled concerns for a full-fledged trade war, reminiscent of the contentious Trump administration’s early years and challenging the strength of North American economic relationships.
Ontonio’s Provocative Move: The 25% Electricity Surcharge
On Tuesday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced a 25% tariff on electricity sold to the U.S., presenting it as a measure to safeguard provincial resources and stabilize energy prices for Canadian families. Ontario, which is home to almost 40% of Canada’s population, is a significant provider of hydropower to surrounding American states such as New York and Michigan. The grid operator of the province, IESO, said exports jumped in recent years due to U.S. demand for clean energy.
Ford justified the surcharge, citing that Ontario households and businesses would not “subsidize cheap power for the U.S. while our own costs increase.” Critics, on the other hand, called the action politically charged, pointing out Ford’s convergence with federal leaders in preparation for possible elections. The action sparked instant criticism from U.S. stakeholders, mainly manufacturers in the Midwest that were dependent on low-cost Canadian hydropower.
Trump’s Blistering Response: Tariffs, Auto Threats, and ‘America First’ Rhetoric
Hours following Ontario’s threat, Trump ratcheted up the war on Truth Social, committing to “fight fire with fire.” Writing a long post, he imposed a 25% tariff on the importation of Canadian electricity and promised to double current steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%—a clear blow to an already battered industry by U.S. trade policies during Trump’s presidency.
Most dramatically, Trump threatened to “permanently shut down the automobile manufacturing business in Canada” if unspecified Canadian tariffs on U.S. products were not eliminated. “Those cars can easily be made in the USA!” he stated, reprising his long-standing complaints about automotive trade deficits. The auto industry threat is at the core of Ontario’s economy, where Stellantis, Ford, and Toyota employ tens of thousands.
Trump’s tweet revisited the rhetoric of his 2016–2020 term, where he re-negotiated NAFTA into the USMCA and levied Section 232 tariffs on Canadian steel on grounds of national security. His recent threats indicate a possible resumption of hardline measures if he is re-elected in 2024.
Ford Fires Back: “Ontario Will Not Back Down”
Premier Doug Ford quickly responded to Trump’s comments on X (formerly Twitter), promising defiance: “Ontario and Canada will not back down until President Trump’s tariffs are gone for good.” His words emphasized the province as a pillar of North American energy and manufacturing, calling for cooperation rather than confrontation.
Ford’s defiance is in line with Canada’s overall approach in previous trade disputes. Ottawa retaliated in 2018 when Trump initially attacked Canadian steel by imposing $16.6 billion worth of tariffs on American products, ranging from bourbon to ketchup. The tit-for-tat strategy, though dangerous, has in the past compelled Washington to negotiate.
Stakes for the Auto Sector: A Pillar of Ontario’s Economy
Trump’s threats to the auto industry hold much gravity. Canada is the world’s 12th-largest vehicle manufacturer, and Ontario produces 90% of the country’s automobiles. The industry creates more than 125,000 direct jobs and adds $16 billion each year to Canada’s GDP.
A 25% American tariff on Canadian-built cars—a prospect under Trump’s “national security” playbook—would be disastrous for the industry. Cars and auto parts now move tariff-free under USMCA, but Trump’s proposed action would cause snugly integrated supply chains to break. “This isn’t a Canadian issue,” cautioned Flavio Volpe, head of Canada’s Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association. “U.S. factories rely on Canadian components. Everybody loses in a trade war.
Steel, Aluminum, and Energy: Revisiting Old Battlegrounds
The aluminum and steel industries, which were only just recovering from Trump’s previous tariffs, are again left in the dark. Canada supplies 40% of U.S. imports of steel, making it the biggest supplier. Trump’s suggested 50% tariff would increase costs for U.S. automakers and construction companies, which could lead to job losses and increased consumer prices.
In the meantime, the electricity rate battle presents a new arena for trade battles. Ontario’s hydro exports, while a small percentage of U.S. energy use, are essential for states making the switch to renewables. “This isn’t about economics—it’s about climate objectives,” declared New York Governor Kathy Hochul, whose state has a goal of 70% renewable energy by 2030.
Historical Context: From NAFTA to USMCA and Beyond
The U.S. and Canada have weathered trade tensions for decades, but Trump’s “America First” policies created a watershed moment. The 2018 steel tariffs tested relations, even with Canada as a NATO ally and leading U.S. trading partner. Although the USMCA soothed waters in 2020, Trump’s recent threats indicate he perceives the deal as not favorably enough.
Trump’s aggressive posture is likely to energize his political base, analysts say, but could alienate industries that rely on Canadian trade. “The 2018 tariffs damaged American manufacturers more than they benefited them,” said Laura Dawson, a former Canadian diplomat. “Repeating those errors would be irresponsible.
Pathways to De-escalation—or Further Conflict
The situation is still fluid. Ottawa has not yet made an official statement, but Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had earlier stressed “standing firm against unjust U.S. trade actions.” Diplomats and business leaders are probably behind the scenes pushing for talks to prevent a cycle of retaliation.
But with Trump doubling down on protectionism and Ford casting the electricity tariff as non-negotiable, space for compromise seems tight. The Biden administration, for its part, is under pressure to react but has so far refused to bless Trump’s bluster.
A Turning Point in U.S.-Canada Trade
The Ontario-Trump controversy illustrates the weaknesses in U.S.-Canada trade relations in the face of increasing protectionist policies. In spite of a long history of robust economic relationships, this conflict illustrates how easily mutual interests can be upended. Companies and consumers on both sides have real stakes, including increased costs, supply chain interruptions, and lost jobs. As tensions rise, it becomes more difficult to find a resolution—but with so much at stake, diplomacy is still an essential way forward.
Click Here to subscribe to our newsletters and get the latest updates directly to your inbox